Can Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Really Be Prevented? A Closer Look at Huang et al.’s Systematic Review | Find Your Stride | Edinburgh Podiatrist

Introduction

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries are a nightmare scenario for athletes, they can sideline a player for a year, end a season, or even a career. Amid the growing adoption of injury prevention programs (IPPs), Huang et al. set out to answer a deceptively simple question: how effective are these programs, really?

Their paper, published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine in 2020 titled 'A Majority of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Can Be Prevented by Injury Prevention Programs', claims to offer the strongest evidence to date that a majority of ACL injuries can be prevented through IPPs. It’s a compelling claim, backed by a careful methodology. But how robust are these conclusions and what do they mean for coaches, clinicians, and athletes?

Can injury prevention programs help athletes to avoid time on the physio table?

The Strengths: Rigorous Design and a Clear Message

First, the positives. Huang et al. deserve credit for addressing long-standing methodological flaws in prior meta-analyses. Previous reviews often bundled in lower-quality studies, failed to account for the time athletes were at risk, and ignored clustering effects inherent in team-based studies. Huang et al. limited their dataset to eight high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs, with a mean PEDro quality score of 7.25—far superior to the average of 4.7 in earlier studies.

Their key finding is striking; injury prevention programs reduced ACL injury incidence by 53%. That’s not a marginal improvement, it’s a potentially game-changing result. Moreover, the authors found low statistical heterogeneity, suggesting consistency in outcomes despite wide variability in program content.

The authors also affirm that successful IPPs commonly included plyometrics, strength training, and agility drills, along with feedback on technique mirroring best-practice recommendations from the National Athletic Trainers’ Association. Perhaps most crucially, they highlight a flexible implementation framework. Coaches can tailor programs to local needs without sacrificing effectiveness, as long as they stick to core components.

The Weaknesses: Narrow Scope, Limited Generalisability

Despite its rigour, the study has some limitations that are important to mention.

1. Limited Pool of Studies: Only eight studies met the inclusion criteria. That’s a narrow evidence base, especially when most of them focused on youth or adolescent female soccer players. While the authors suggest a 53% reduction in ACL injuries across programs, it’s unclear whether these findings generalise to other populations; adult athletes, different sports, or male participants, for instance.

2. Lack of Contact Injury Analysis: The authors admit that their analysis couldn’t distinguish between contact and non-contact ACL injuries, despite most IPPs targeting the latter. This matters because if a large portion of injuries in the analysed studies were contact-based, the actual effectiveness of IPPs at preventing preventable (non-contact) ACL tears might be underestimated or worse, misrepresented.

3. Un-reported Compliance and Fidelity: The real-world success of any injury prevention effort depends on how well it is adopted and followed. Unfortunately, most of the studies included didn’t report on compliance or whether the programs were delivered as intended. This makes it hard to know whether the reported 53% reduction reflects the programs themselves or the motivation of early-adopting teams.

4. Sensitivity Analysis and Clustering Effects: The authors commendably attempted to account for clustering (i.e., team-based grouping), but couldn’t apply full statistical corrections due to missing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) in the source studies. They instead used a sensitivity analysis with an estimated ICC, which adds some robustness but ultimately this is still an approximation.

Final Verdict: Cautiously Optimistic, with Room to Grow

This paper makes a strong case that properly structured ACL injury prevention programs work and work well. For coaches, physical therapists, and team physicians, the practical implications are encouraging: you don’t need a one-size-fits-all program, just a flexible system with a few non-negotiable components.

But the evidence base remains relatively narrow, and broader implementation studies are still needed, especially in sports and populations beyond female youth soccer. Until then, this paper should serve as a call to action: IPPs are likely effective, but we must move beyond controlled trials and into the messy world of real-world practice to fully realise their potential.

Find Your Stride!