top of page
Search

Can Balance & Perturbation Training Fix Runner’s Knee?A Critical Review for Podiatrists, Clinicians & Athletes | Find Your Stride | Edinburgh Podiatrist

Overview

This 2026 randomised controlled trial by Zare Bidoki & Haj Lotfalian investigated whether combined balance and perturbation training improves the following in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS):


  • Gluteal muscle activation (EMG)

  • Hip kinematics

  • Pain (VAS)

  • Function (AKPS)


Participants completed a 6-week neuromuscular training program (18 sessions) or no intervention.


Physical therapist in teal scrubs braces a patient’s bent knee on a mat in a bright clinic, suggesting focused rehab care
Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) also known as Runner's Knee is a common complaint

🏃 Key Findings (What Matters Clinically)

The intervention group demonstrated:


  • ↑ Gluteus medius activation

  • ↓ Gluteus maximus overactivity

  • Faster muscle activation timing

  • ↓ Hip adduction (less “knee valgus”)

  • ↑ Hip flexion during step-up

  • ↓ Pain and ↑ function scores


👉 In simple terms: Better hip control = better knee mechanics = less pain


🦶 Why This Matters in Podiatry & Running

While the study focuses on proximal control (hip and glutes), it has direct implications for foot and ankle clinicians:


1. The Hip–Foot Connection

Excessive hip adduction contributes to:


  • Dynamic knee valgus

  • Increased patellofemoral joint stress

  • Compensatory foot pronation


👉 This reinforces the kinetic chain model:

You can’t fully treat runner’s knee from the foot alone.


2. Implications for Orthotic Therapy

This paper indirectly challenges a common clinical trap:


❌ Orthotics alone for PFPS

✅ Integrated approach:

  • Foot control (orthoses, footwear)

  • Hip strength & neuromuscular control


3. Running Performance Angle

Improved neuromuscular timing (earlier glute activation) suggests:


  • More efficient force transfer

  • Reduced energy leaks

  • Potential improvements in running economy


However, this was not directly measured — a key limitation.


⚖️ Strengths of the Study

✔️ Randomized Controlled Design

A solid methodology strengthens internal validity.


✔️ Objective Biomechanical Measures

  • EMG for muscle activity

  • 3D motion capture for hip kinematics

This goes beyond typical “pain-only” studies.


✔️ Functional Task (Step-Up)

Relevant to:

  • Running

  • Stair climbing

  • Daily loading patterns


⚠️ Key Limitations (Important for Clinicians)

1. Small Sample Size (n = 29)

Limits generalisability and statistical power.


2. Female-Only Participants

PFPS is more common in females, but:

  • Results may not apply to male runners


3. No Active Control Group

The control group did nothing.

👉 This exaggerates perceived effectiveness:

  • Any structured exercise may have produced similar results


4. Short-Term Outcomes Only

No follow-up beyond 6 weeks.

👉 Unknown:

  • Do improvements persist?

  • Does it reduce injury recurrence?


5. Not Runner-Specific

Participants were physically inactive 

👉 Major issue for sports clinicians:

  • Running biomechanics ≠ sedentary movement patterns


6. Missing Foot & Ankle Data

No assessment of:

  • Foot posture

  • Ground reaction forces

  • Running gait

👉 This is a critical gap for podiatry relevance.


🧩 Clinical Takeaways for Podiatrists

🔹 1. Treat PFPS as a Whole-System Problem

  • Hip control is essential

  • Foot mechanics still matter

👉 Best outcomes = proximal + distal integration


🔹 2. Add Perturbation Training to Rehab

This study supports adding:

  • Balance boards

  • Unstable surfaces

  • Reactive drills

👉 Especially for:

  • Runners with poor control

  • Recurrent knee pain


🔹 3. Don’t Over-Rely on Strength Alone

The key improvement wasn’t just strength — it was:

👉 Timing + coordination (neuromuscular control)


🔹 4. Bridge the Gap to Running

Before return to sport, progress toward:

  • Single-leg loading

  • Plyometrics

  • Running-specific drills


🏁 Final Verdict

This study adds valuable evidence that:

👉 Neuromuscular training targeting the glutes can improve pain and biomechanics in PFPS

However, for podiatry and running populations the study:

❗ Lacks foot/ankle integration

❗ Was not tested in athletes


Clinical Bottom Line

If you’re treating runner’s knee, don’t choose between orthotics or hip rehab. You need both — and ideally, you need coordination training on top.


📚 Citation

Zare Bidoki, F., & Haj Lotfalian, M. (2026). The effects of combined balance and perturbation training on gluteal muscle activity and hip kinematics in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 27:219.


Find Your Stride!

 
 
 

Comments


©2026 Find Your Stride

bottom of page